soccervur.blogg.se

Backblaze b2 s3 compatible
Backblaze b2 s3 compatible













backblaze b2 s3 compatible

(Edit: maybe that’s erasure encoding as you put it, not replication). Wasabi is 100% not replicated, they rotate data between servers thats why they have this minimum retention policy.īackBlaze shreds each file and can handle 3 drives failing until the ”tome” has been rebuilt (one ”tome” is 20 drives). Maybe there’s some other backup you could remove or make smaller and save money doing that, considering how replicated S3 is.ī2 is replicated? I thought they are using only erasure coding. Maybe there’s some other backup you could remove or make smaller and save money doing that, considering how replicated S3 said:

backblaze b2 s3 compatible

Sure, but cost per safety ain’t that high, considering it’s replicated.

backblaze b2 s3 compatible

For under that I could easily colo something and recoup the cost savings of the build. The cost per TB is somewhat high and Wasabi is the only one that seems to be decent about degrees where B2 and S3 / S3 Glacier would be wildly expensive if I needed to do a full restore. For under that I could easily colo something and recoup the cost savings of the said: Your ask of 1 GB ram indicates you really don’t want/need the compute power, so why not collect the benefits of not needing such? Your ask of 1 GB ram indicates you really don’t want/need the compute power, so why not collect the benefits of not needing said: I just now made a choice between storing tons of data on my VPS and backing up to S3 compatible storage or storing it as a main storage on S3 compatible storage and then also backing it up to another S3 compatibe storage.įirst of all they’re usually very safe and replicated (hence not even comparable), and, even more importantly, no scaling worries ever. You said you weren’t interested in storage solutions but I can’t help to think that some really cheap cold storage could be interesting. I'll have to look into some other options, likely making a small storage box and throwing it somewhere. I just don't need that much resource for a system used to store data that may or may not be retrieved and isn't running any applications. I never saw a VPS with minimum spec (1vCPU + 1GB RAM) having more than 10TB, let alone 50++ TB.















Backblaze b2 s3 compatible